Call Us Today
Free Consultation 410-321-4994

Harford County & Bel Air Divorce Lawyer | Alimony | Rehabilitative Alimony.

Baltimore County & Towson Alimony Lawyer

Spousal Support in Maryland 

The second type of Alimony available during the divorce process is rehabilitative Alimony, and unlike temporary Alimony, rehabilitative Alimony is awarded after the marriage is dissolved. The purpose of rehabilitative Alimony is to help the economically dependent spouse transition to single life and become self-supporting,g if that is so if the circumstances.The duration and amount of rehabilitative Alimony vary from case to case. Therefore, thee ultimate decision rests on a trial judge with a great deal of latitude in making these determinations. Although rehabilitative Alimony is a subject of great uncertainty in many family law matters, Maryland's Family Law Article requires the Circuit Court to consider the following factors when adjudicating rehabilitative Alimony.'

Rehabilitative Alimony in Maryland

Rehabilitative alimony decisions in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County emphasize fairness and financial independence. Judges follow Maryland law, evaluating specific factors to determine whether alimony is justified, how much should be paid, and the duration of payments. Judges review each spouse’s finances—income, assets, and expenses— to assess the lower-earning spouse’s potential to become self-sufficient. The court considers how long it will realistically take for the requesting spouse to gain sufficient education, job training, or employment and sets alimony accordingly.

The marital standard of living also informs the court’s decision to prevent either party from experiencing unnecessary hardship. Judges look closely at the length of the marriage and the roles each spouse fulfilled; longer marriages, especially when one spouse primarily managed the household or raised children, tend to support an alimony award. Contributions to the family’s financial well-being, such as income, and non-financial efforts, including childcare and homemaking, are recognized as important factors.

Maryland law allows judges to weigh misconduct, such as adultery or abandonment, although these issues are not decisive on their own. Other relevant factors include the spouses’ ages, health conditions, any prior agreements, and the paying spouse’s ability to maintain their own financial stability while providing alimony. Judges in Baltimore County have broad discretion and aim for a fair outcome tailored to each family’s unique situation.

In the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, rehabilitative alimony is viewed primarily as temporary support to enable financial independence. Maryland generally favors limited-term alimony rather than indefinite awards, reserving lifelong support for special circumstances, like permanent disability or severe economic disparity despite earnest efforts toward self-support. Typically, judges align the alimony duration with the realistic rehabilitation plan provided by the spouse seeking support. For instance, if job training requires two years, the court usually awards alimony for approximately that period.

Baltimore County judges frequently rely on vocational experts to assess a spouse’s realistic employment opportunities and earning capabilities. This ensures alimony awards reflect properly introduced evidence and vocational experts from certifierd vocational experts certified by the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation. A spouse with greater resources may be expected to pay more, but not to the extent of undermining their own financial obligations.

Every detail impacts the court’s decision: short marriages with dual-income spouses might result in minimal or no alimony, whereas long marriages involving substantial career sacrifices often justify extended support. Judges in Baltimore County value precise, concrete evidence of each spouse’s needs, assets, and earning potential. Alimony outcomes vary significantly due to these individual considerations, and judges regularly speak of balancing all statutory factors to reach an equitable result.

The approach taken by the Circuit Court for Baltimore County prioritizes fairness and independence. Alimony is structured to help dependent spouses rebuild financially without imposing excessive burdens on either party. This practical method ensures alimony functions as transitional support rather than permanent reliance or an undue hardship.

Factors That Circuit Court for Baltimore County Judges Use To Award Rehabilitative Alimony.

Maryland law establishes alimony primarily as rehabilitative, not a permanent pension. The aim is temporary support, helping the economically dependent spouse become self-sufficient. Md. Code, Family Law § 11-106 lists specific factors courts must weigh in determining alimony. These factors include the dependent spouse’s ability to support themselves fully or partially, the time required for education or job training, length of marriage, marital standard of living, each spouse’s family contributions, and each party’s age, health, and financial resources. Maryland courts generally prefer rehabilitative alimony with a fixed duration, enabling the dependent spouse to transition toward financial independence. Indefinite alimony—awarded without an end date—is available only in limited circumstances: either the dependent spouse cannot reasonably become self-supporting due to age, illness, disability, or infirmity, or the economic disparity between the spouses would be unconscionably unfair even after reasonable efforts at self-support. 

Maryland’s statutory scheme emphasizes easing the dependent spouse’s shift from married to single life, not permanently equalizing incomes. Courts therefore typically award rehabilitative alimony for a limited time to facilitate financial independence, reserving lifelong support for exceptional situations only.

When evaluating rehabilitative alimony, courts closely analyze a spouse’s capacity to become financially independent. Judges must make clear findings regarding the spouse’s potential to support themselves and how long achieving self-sufficiency might take. Courts consider the spouse’s education, employment skills, work history, age, health, and what additional training or education may be needed. Judges also evaluate the spouse’s efforts toward employment, reasons for unemployment (such as childcare responsibilities during marriage), and whether those efforts are genuine. If a spouse intentionally remains underemployed or fails to pursue employment, courts may impute income, assigning them an earning capacity even if they’re not actually employed. However, Maryland appellate courts require solid evidence before income can be imputed. For example, in Reynolds v. Reynolds (2014), the husband asserted that his wife—who held advanced degrees but had not worked in 20 years—could earn between $30,000 and $40,000 annually, but he failed to provide recent evidence or expert testimony to substantiate this claim. Consequently, the court refused to impute income to her and instead awarded substantial alimony. This highlights Maryland’s insistence on concrete evidence regarding employment prospects and potential earnings before requiring a dependent spouse to become financially independent.

VOCATIONAL EXPERTS CAN HELP WIN YOUR ALIMONY CASE

Vocational experts matter in your Baltimore County alimony case. Whether you’re seeking alimony or hoping to limit payments, vocational experts strengthen your claim by providing clear, credible evidence about your earning capacity, your spouse's earning capacity, and the future earning potentials for both of you. When the vocational evaluation is produced, judges rely on these vocational experts to understand how much your spouse can realistically earn, after in the near-terrm and after advancing careers with retraining.  

In Francz v. Francz, a vocational expert’s testimony persuaded the judge that the wife could significantly increase her earnings after two years of education, resulting in a shorter, limited alimony award. On the other hand, in Hiltz v. Hiltz, the absence of expert testimony weakened the wife’s claim that medical conditions prevented employment, causing the court to reject indefinite alimony.

The bottom line: using a vocational expert to clearly show your spouse’s employment potential can greatly influence whether alimony is awarded, how much you pay or receive, and how long the payments last.

MILESTONES IN REHABILITATIVE ALIMONY LAW

  • In Tracey v. Tracey (1992), Maryland’s top court clarified alimony isn’t meant to be lifelong support. Its purpose is to ease spouses into separate lives, reinforcing Maryland’s preference for rehabilitative, short-term awards—except when extraordinary circumstances exist.
  • Blaine v. Blaine (1994) echoed this principle. The wife initially received five years of rehabilitative alimony, then asked the trial court to extend it indefinitely. The Court of Appeals supported the trial judge’s discretion: at the end of a fixed term, if a spouse still cannot realistically become self-supporting, courts can extend or convert the award into indefinite alimony. Blaine showed that trial judges can revisit awards to reflect real-life outcomes.
  • In Simonds v. Simonds (2005), after a 16-year marriage, the trial court ordered just three years of declining rehabilitative alimony—though the husband earned nearly 30 times the wife’s income. The appellate court found this inadequate and required reconsideration, citing the extreme financial gap and the wife’s long absence from employment. Judges must directly address if indefinite alimony makes sense in such cases, explaining why or why not.
  • K.B. v. D.B. (2020) addressed a similar scenario—a nearly 20-year marriage with a wife who had never worked outside the home. The trial court awarded only temporary alimony, even though the husband earned over $1.5 million annually and the wife had minimal earning potential. The Appellate Court found this unacceptable. It determined the disparity—$35,000 versus $1.5 million per year—would never be reasonably closed, making indefinite alimony appropriate. The appellate court reinforced that huge income gaps after long marriages demand indefinite support.
  • Reynolds v. Reynolds (2014) emphasized the need for solid evidence on earning capacity. The husband argued his wife could easily find employment due to her education but failed to provide any expert testimony or reliable proof. Without vocational evidence, the court declined to assume the wife’s potential earnings and upheld a substantial alimony award. Reynolds demonstrates that challenging a spouse’s earning capacity without expert evidence usually fails.

These decisions matter because they directly impact how courts decide your alimony case in Baltimore County. They underline the importance of clearly demonstrating a spouse’s ability—or inability—to earn, and highlight how courts approach fairness and financial realities when awarding rehabilitative or indefinite alimony.

Protect Your Financial Future.

Please call 410-321-4994 during business hours to schedule a free consultation to discuss whether you would like to retain Amar S. Weisman's legal services. Please note that our firm does not accept pro bono clients at this time. To secure legal services and receive advice, a retainer fee is required, and you can refer to our Policy on Fees/Costs for more details. Our law firm is conveniently located in the heart of Towson, close to prominent landmarks such as The Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Towson Town Center, Goucher College, and Towson University. You can find us at 1018 Dulaney Valley Road (MD-146), Second Floor, Towson, MD 21204 We proudly serve clients throughout the Baltimore area, including Aberdeen, Abingdon, Baldwin, Bel Air, Bowleys Quarters, Brooklandville, Carney, Catonsville, Cockeysville, Edgewood, Essex, Garrison, Glen Arm, Greenspring Valley, Homeland, Hunt Valley, Hydes, the Joppa Road Corridor, Kingsville, Long Green, Lutherville, Middle River, Nottingham, Owings Mills, Parkville, Pikesville, Perry Hall, Reisterstown, Riderwood, Rodgers Forge, Rosedale, Ruxton, Sparks, Sparrows Point, Stoneleigh, Timonium, Towson, West Towson, White Hall, White Marsh, and the York Road corridor. We have also provided legal representation to out-of-state clients. However, please be aware that our law firm does not guarantee specific outcomes in any legal matter.

Save

Save